Originally published as 62 Tenn. Permission for WWW use at this site generously granted by the author. For educational use only. The printed edition remains canonical.
Today I want to look at one specific hypothesis which can be summed up like this: In fact, the huge success of the Saint Petersburg summit and the Parliamentary Forum is proof that this strategy is working. This hypothesis is predicated on one crucial assumption: But is that assumption warranted?
Forget about those fierce looking European armies, they are all a joke. Furthermore, in terms of training, force planning, weapon systems procurement, deployment and maintenance, EU states are also totally dependent on the USA. In reality in the EU, as in Canada, they all know who is boss.
And here is the single most important fact: NATO desperately needs Russia as justification for its own existence: Do you really think that anybody will let that happen?
And right now, the Europeans are busy asking for more US troops on their soil, not less and they are all pretending to be terrified by a Russian invasionhence the need for more and bigger military exercises close to the Russian border.
Third, there is a long list of EU governments which vitally need further bad relationships with Russia. Unpopular governments which need to explain their own failures by the nefarious actions of an external bogyman.
A good example is how the Spanish authorities blamed Russia for the crisis in Catalonia. Governments whose rhetoric has been so hysterically anti-Russian that they cannot possibly back down from it.
True, now that EU subsidies are running out, the situation of these states is becoming even more dire, and they know that the only place where they can still get money is the USA. The best example is France and how it treated the National Front. Contrary to a very often repeated myth, European business interests do not represent a powerful anti-russophobic force.
Just look at Germany: Oh sure, there is a pro-trade lobby with Russian interest in Europe. It is real, but it simply does not have anywhere near the power the anti-Russian forces in the EU have.
The current mini-wars between the US and the EU on trade, on Iran, on Jerusalem do not at all mean that Russia automatically can benefit from this. Just like the US and Israeli leaders can disagree and, on occasion, fight each other, that does not at all mean that somehow they are not fundamentally joined at the hip.
The Ukrainian crisis will only benefit anti-Russian forces in Europe. I submit that the outcome of such an attack is not in doubt — the Ukronazis will lose. The only question is this: This is probably the most likely outcome.
Should this happen, there is a very high probability of a Novorussian counter attack to liberate most of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, especially the cities of Slaviansk and Mariupol. Since past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, we can be pretty darn sure of what the reaction in Kiev and in the West will be: Russia will be blamed for it all.
[This analysis was written for the Unz Review] The re-nomination (albeit somewhat reshuffled) of the “economic block” of the Medvedev government has elicited many explanations, some better than others. For me, as a mid 30s Asian American male, I see the difficulty you may be having is the terminology you’re using. Historically, I’ve seen the “gender divide” as an issue between the sexes from a political, cultural, and social perspective. BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard.
Thus, a Novorussian victory will result in more hysterical Russophobia. Putin simply cannot allow this to happen.
If the Russians are forced to intervene, this will not be a massive ground invasion — there is no need for that. Russia has the firepower needed in the form of missile and artillery strikes to destroy the attacking Urkonazi forces and to impose a no-fly zone over all of Novorussia.
If Kiev pushes on and launches a full-scale attack on Russia proper, the Ukrainian armed forces will be totally disorganized and cease combat in about 48 hours. So, AngloZionists will finally! I will admit that there is still a small possibility that a Ukronazi attack might not happen.The Wuhan Gang & The Chungking Gang, i.e., the offsprings of the American missionaries, diplomats, military officers, 'revolutionaries' & Red Saboteurs and the "Old China Hands" of the s and the herald-runners of the Dixie Mission of the s.
(Note that the Soviet Red Army military advisers sent to China were mostly German . schwenkreis.comve, we see a victim of the Bad Nenndorf 'concentration camp'.The Bad Nenndorf 'concentration camp'The Bad .
Washington's Spies: The Story of America's First Spy Ring and millions of other books are available for instant schwenkreis.com | Audible.
Tennessee Law Review; A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment, by Glenn Harlan Reynolds. Marriage and plantation life. Immediately on resigning his commission, Washington was married (January 6, ) to Martha Dandridge, the widow of Daniel Parke schwenkreis.com was a few months older than he, was the mother of two children living and two dead, and possessed one of the considerable fortunes of Virginia.
“Do you think his assessment is accurate?” was the subject line of an email I got from a good friend recently. The email referred to the article by Paul Craig Roberts “One Day Tomorrow Won’t Arrive” which claimed that “the US military is now second class compared to the Russian military“.
The article then went on to list a number of .